<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your chance to speak out: Icondesigner.net multi-platform icons?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cocoia.com/2007/05/31/your-chance-to-speak-out-icondesignernet-multi-platform-icons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cocoia.com/2007/05/31/your-chance-to-speak-out-icondesignernet-multi-platform-icons/</link>
	<description>The Cocoia Blog is the website of Sebastiaan de With, a Dutch Icon and Interface designer.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: gyurisc</title>
		<link>http://blog.cocoia.com/2007/05/31/your-chance-to-speak-out-icondesignernet-multi-platform-icons/#comment-32637</link>
		<dc:creator>gyurisc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 07:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cocoia.com/?p=113#comment-32637</guid>
		<description>it would be very coo, if you can do multiplatform icons. Would you design icons for Windows as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it would be very coo, if you can do multiplatform icons. Would you design icons for Windows as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felipe</title>
		<link>http://blog.cocoia.com/2007/05/31/your-chance-to-speak-out-icondesignernet-multi-platform-icons/#comment-5110</link>
		<dc:creator>Felipe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 13:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cocoia.com/?p=113#comment-5110</guid>
		<description>If it's not to much work to package the icons for other OS'es (which I guess is not), what do you fear?
It can only enlarge the 'audience' :)
If 'glossy' or 'macish' icon themes like nuoveXT or Snowish are successfull for Linux, why shouldn't people care about your icons?
I don't think Vista users will be a big audience ...they will likely want to go their own ways because they're not into macish designs at all. They've got all they need with Aqua ...eer ..I mean Aero ;)
I'd go for multi-platform icons - it can't hurt :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s not to much work to package the icons for other OS&#8217;es (which I guess is not), what do you fear?<br />
It can only enlarge the &#8216;audience&#8217; :)<br />
If &#8216;glossy&#8217; or &#8216;macish&#8217; icon themes like nuoveXT or Snowish are successfull for Linux, why shouldn&#8217;t people care about your icons?<br />
I don&#8217;t think Vista users will be a big audience &#8230;they will likely want to go their own ways because they&#8217;re not into macish designs at all. They&#8217;ve got all they need with Aqua &#8230;eer ..I mean Aero ;)<br />
I&#8217;d go for multi-platform icons - it can&#8217;t hurt :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sebastiaan</title>
		<link>http://blog.cocoia.com/2007/05/31/your-chance-to-speak-out-icondesignernet-multi-platform-icons/#comment-5106</link>
		<dc:creator>sebastiaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 13:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cocoia.com/?p=113#comment-5106</guid>
		<description>It's true that (mostly Praetorian) the icons use some degree of 'gloss'. I am pushing for a more 'diffused' look as you can see in the Preview replacement icon, and Praetorian has different icon states (which complicate the design - but hey, that's going to be very clear soon with the beta).

Thanks for the input, I have obviously considered multiple formats when I started but as you said, I consider my 'target audience' to be Mac users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true that (mostly Praetorian) the icons use some degree of &#8216;gloss&#8217;. I am pushing for a more &#8216;diffused&#8217; look as you can see in the Preview replacement icon, and Praetorian has different icon states (which complicate the design - but hey, that&#8217;s going to be very clear soon with the beta).</p>
<p>Thanks for the input, I have obviously considered multiple formats when I started but as you said, I consider my &#8216;target audience&#8217; to be Mac users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blog.cocoia.com/2007/05/31/your-chance-to-speak-out-icondesignernet-multi-platform-icons/#comment-5098</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 12:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cocoia.com/?p=113#comment-5098</guid>
		<description>You seem focused on the Mac, so why not stay that way? 

I've looked at some of your icon/graphic work. Much of it (wireshark/praetorian) seems very "glassy". Remind me more of Vista than Mac OS X. 

When I look at my Dock, the majority of my icons are colourful and "shiny", rather than dark and glassy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem focused on the Mac, so why not stay that way? </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve looked at some of your icon/graphic work. Much of it (wireshark/praetorian) seems very &#8220;glassy&#8221;. Remind me more of Vista than Mac OS X. </p>
<p>When I look at my Dock, the majority of my icons are colourful and &#8220;shiny&#8221;, rather than dark and glassy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
